<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Food as information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.actboldly.com/2006/04/18/food-as-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.actboldly.com/2006/04/18/food-as-information/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:17:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marla</title>
		<link>http://www.actboldly.com/2006/04/18/food-as-information/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Marla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actboldly.com/?p=160#comment-314</guid>
		<description>Well, I knew I would get some quibbling over my use of the word &quot;usless.&quot; Please allow me some dramatic license, hence the modifier &quot;nearly.&quot; I&#039;m trying to make the point about calories, that they are not something to avoid at all costs, they are the source of energy that fuels your body. Those zero-calorie foods are mostly water, which is why they&#039;re zero-calorie. Yes, water is also a good thing, but one needs other things too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I knew I would get some quibbling over my use of the word &#8220;usless.&#8221; Please allow me some dramatic license, hence the modifier &#8220;nearly.&#8221; I&#8217;m trying to make the point about calories, that they are not something to avoid at all costs, they are the source of energy that fuels your body. Those zero-calorie foods are mostly water, which is why they&#8217;re zero-calorie. Yes, water is also a good thing, but one needs other things too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.actboldly.com/2006/04/18/food-as-information/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actboldly.com/?p=160#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Marla, will do re UltraMetabolism soon. BTW, I do have one minor quibble with your comment re your zero calorie foods. Turns out some of &#039;em aren&#039;t quite so useless. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=foodspice&amp;dbid=14&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Celery&lt;/a&gt;, for example, turns out to have a surprising amount of vitamin C and potassium. And Rachel Heller (of Carb Addicts Diet fame) swears by two stalks of celery a day to help avoid low-carb related constipation. 

And it turns out that some lettuces (like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=foodspice&amp;dbid=61&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;romaine&lt;/a&gt;) are also really good for you. If I can have a salad with spinach, romaine, or the spring lettuces (any darker green), I fill &#039;er up!

Hopefully this nutrient approach will kick off, because right now all the food guides are geared primarily towards talking about macronutrient composition (how much protein, fat or carb foods have). 

The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whfoods.com/foodstoc.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;World&#039;s Healthiest Foods&lt;/a&gt; page is actually pretty helpful. Courtesy of an episode of &lt;em&gt;Good Eats&lt;/em&gt;, I had been steering away from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=foodspice&amp;dbid=22&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;eggplant&lt;/a&gt; as a nutritionally useless food, but according to WHF, it too has some nutrients, as does &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=foodspice&amp;dbid=42&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cucumber&lt;/a&gt; (which is cool, &#039;cause I do love cucumber).

One of the caveats with veggies though is that in many cases, a lot of the nutrients are in the skin (this is why I buy the English cucumbers that come wrapped in plastic...no wax).

So, while celery, lettuce, and cucumbers aren&#039;t super foods, they probably are more useful than you might think. But they probably shouldn&#039;t be your sole go-tos for veggies, as you suggest!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marla, will do re UltraMetabolism soon. BTW, I do have one minor quibble with your comment re your zero calorie foods. Turns out some of &#8216;em aren&#8217;t quite so useless. <a href="http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=foodspice&amp;dbid=14" rel="nofollow">Celery</a>, for example, turns out to have a surprising amount of vitamin C and potassium. And Rachel Heller (of Carb Addicts Diet fame) swears by two stalks of celery a day to help avoid low-carb related constipation. </p>
<p>And it turns out that some lettuces (like <a href="http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=foodspice&amp;dbid=61" rel="nofollow">romaine</a>) are also really good for you. If I can have a salad with spinach, romaine, or the spring lettuces (any darker green), I fill &#8216;er up!</p>
<p>Hopefully this nutrient approach will kick off, because right now all the food guides are geared primarily towards talking about macronutrient composition (how much protein, fat or carb foods have). </p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.whfoods.com/foodstoc.php" rel="nofollow">World&#8217;s Healthiest Foods</a> page is actually pretty helpful. Courtesy of an episode of <em>Good Eats</em>, I had been steering away from <a href="http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=foodspice&amp;dbid=22" rel="nofollow">eggplant</a> as a nutritionally useless food, but according to WHF, it too has some nutrients, as does <a href="http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=foodspice&amp;dbid=42" rel="nofollow">cucumber</a> (which is cool, &#8217;cause I do love cucumber).</p>
<p>One of the caveats with veggies though is that in many cases, a lot of the nutrients are in the skin (this is why I buy the English cucumbers that come wrapped in plastic&#8230;no wax).</p>
<p>So, while celery, lettuce, and cucumbers aren&#8217;t super foods, they probably are more useful than you might think. But they probably shouldn&#8217;t be your sole go-tos for veggies, as you suggest!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marla</title>
		<link>http://www.actboldly.com/2006/04/18/food-as-information/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Marla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actboldly.com/?p=160#comment-306</guid>
		<description>Are you reading the Ultrametabolism book now? I will need a full report, omit no detail.

I agree with the focus on nutrition vs. calories. One of the mistakes I always made when I tried to lose weight was eating a lot of &quot;zero calorie&quot; foods. Celery, lettuce, pickles, cucumbers, etc. There&#039;s nothing wrong with those foods, but they&#039;re nutritionally nearly useless, and the obvious problem is THEY DON&#039;T FILL YOU UP!  Not to mention you get no energy from them: that&#039;s what calories ARE, energy. It can be a bit of a Catch-22, trying to find the balance between adequate or even optimum nutrition and losing weight. You&#039;re almost always better off, health-wise, to choose the nutrition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you reading the Ultrametabolism book now? I will need a full report, omit no detail.</p>
<p>I agree with the focus on nutrition vs. calories. One of the mistakes I always made when I tried to lose weight was eating a lot of &#8220;zero calorie&#8221; foods. Celery, lettuce, pickles, cucumbers, etc. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with those foods, but they&#8217;re nutritionally nearly useless, and the obvious problem is THEY DON&#8217;T FILL YOU UP!  Not to mention you get no energy from them: that&#8217;s what calories ARE, energy. It can be a bit of a Catch-22, trying to find the balance between adequate or even optimum nutrition and losing weight. You&#8217;re almost always better off, health-wise, to choose the nutrition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim PFB</title>
		<link>http://www.actboldly.com/2006/04/18/food-as-information/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim PFB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 01:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actboldly.com/?p=160#comment-305</guid>
		<description>Great article. I like the focus on nutrition. Congrats on taking control of your eating situation! :) Nice blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. I like the focus on nutrition. Congrats on taking control of your eating situation! :) Nice blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

