Living Large
Posted March 18, 2006 at 9:10 am
Over the last few months, I’ve developed a habit of catching Hardball and Countdown on MSNBC. On Thursday’s Hardball, Chris Matthews talked with Michael Berman, author of the new book, Living Large: A Big Man’s Ideas on Weight, Success, and Acceptance.
Transcripts and more after the break.
Here’s part of their discussion (from the MSNBC transcript):
MATTHEWS: Welcome back to HARDBALL. There‘s a new political hot topic out there lately, weight loss, which is funny because you won‘t find any politician encouraging people to be unhealthy, but big stars like former President Clinton, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Governor Mike Huckabee of Arkansas, a 2008 wannabe, by the way, are out there promoting healthy living.
Washington political veteran Mike Berman has a new book out called “Living Large.” It‘s a very personal story about what it‘s like to be overweight. And now he‘s learned to manage it in his real life, both physically and spiritually. Mike Berman, buddy, thank you. So what is your big message? “Living Large” sounds like you‘re happy to be doll king of thing.
MIKE BERMAN, AUTHOR: Well but the big message is if you‘re an adult and you‘re fat, you‘re going to be fat for the rest of your life. It‘s a chronic disease, learn how to manage it because the day is not going to come when you look like the average athlete.
MATTHEWS: But what about problems like diabetes? Don‘t you have to deal with them?
BERMAN: Of course, you have to try and get your weight down, but the fact is most people can‘t do it.
MATTHEWS: What happens? Everybody says, “OK, I just joined a health club or I just stopped eating white meat, or red meat.” Everybody comes up to you and they‘re losing weight, great, for two or three months. They say, “Oh, I‘ve got a new workout guy who‘s working with me or I just quit red meat,” and then you see them three months later and they‘re back to where they were.
BERMAN: Because whatever they‘ve done to lose the weight is not something they can sustain. They‘ve changed their lifestyle too much and they go back to the regular lifestyle, you just put the weight back on.
MATTHEWS: What makes you reach for that first donut after three months? You‘ve been giving then up for three months.
BERMAN: It‘s there.
MATTHEWS: That‘s it?
BERMAN: That‘s it.
MATTHEWS: Or that apple fritter at Starbucks.
BERMAN: You‘re feeling good about yourself. The apple fritter at Starbucks, 820 calories, one of my favorite things.
MATTHEWS: The best thing on earth, changes your life for 10 minutes.
BERMAN: Exactly right. Doesn‘t even take me 10 minutes to finish it.
MATTHEWS: But the feeling, you say it‘s just human nature to go back to what you are.
BERMAN: It‘s not human nature. It‘s the fact that if you‘re a really fat person, there‘s something else going on in your life, something psychological is going on in your life that causes you to turn to food and eventually it causes the food and your size to become part of your personality. As you get thinner, you think you‘re a different person, you‘re not, but you think you are.
MATTHEWS: Don‘t you feel like you‘ve left a load somewhere, you‘ve dropped your saddle bags when you‘re walking around, for a while, you have that wonderful light-footed feeling.
BERMAN: And that feeling becomes part of your every day and then gee, one donut, what difference does it make?
MATTHEWS: It doesn‘t make any difference the first day or two. The scales are the same and you say, “That donut didn‘t kill me.”
BERMAN: And if it was only one donut, you‘d be fine. But it‘s the multiples and the many times. And instead of eating a chicken leg, it‘s eating half the chicken. It‘s all part of it.
Berman also made an appearance on Good Morning American, and said:
Even fat people don’t get it. I’ve come to learn it’s a chronic disease and there’s no magic pill. All of the diets worked. I lost weight, but I couldn’t keep it off. That’s part of the disease. You may lose the weight, but you haven’t lost the problem that caused you to gain weight in the first place and so you gain it back.
I tend to agree with Berman that diets don’t work, and in fact, can make it worse. But I don’t agree that it’s always about “something psychological is going on in your life that causes you to turn to food.” Or at least that the implication that overeating is solely psychological in nature.
What I think is that overeating, for me at least, has both a psychological (emotional eating) and physiological (cravings) aspect to it. I may start to overeat because I’m angry or depressed, but I believe I keep overeating because of the biochemical response to sugar, refined white stuff, and so on.
Later this weekend, I’m going to post about a new book coming out, Ultrametabolism, which, in a moment of serendipity, I caught on PBS late last night. The approach pushed in this book seems very similar to my current approach, which is one of eating for health (an approach that is valid regardless of your weight).
Alas, it it does not have an answer to the “how to have cake and eat it too” question that many of us have. But more about that later.

March 18th, 2006 at 5:54 pm
I don’t think that it’s necessarily always psychological, but I do think that it is often psychological. There could be other factors, of course, biology, genetics and health issues to contend.
Another issue is that we’re caught up in diets and diets and diets thinking “Well once I lose my weight I can go back eating normally.” Except they forget that eating “normally” is what got them there in the first place. This can’t be a diet, this has to be something that you are willing to deal with for the rest of your life or you will fail.
March 19th, 2006 at 7:07 am
i almost posted a comment a few days ago when you mentioned the pyschological and physiological components of overeating. This is exactly how a practicing alcoholic drinks. Drinking to oblivion masks feelings and sets up physical cravings. Again and again and again.
I solved my drinking problem through abstinence, and know that I will forever more fight physical food cravings. I can’t stop eating, but I can stop eating the wrong things. I don’t need sugar or white flour in order to live. In fact, they will – eventually – kill me. Of this I am fairly certain.
March 19th, 2006 at 12:01 pm
“Alas, it it does not have an answer to the “how to have cake and eat it too” question that many of us have.” I have an answer, Beth, and I’m busting my tush to get people to believe it. I know I don’t have forever, though. Wish me luck.
March 19th, 2006 at 12:33 pm
Mary, I looked at your plan when you first commented here. It wouldn’t have been a good match for me, as I’ve already said I’m not much for planning and measuring. And I realize you want to make a living, and that anyone’s time is valuable, but $20 a pound ($160 a month at your suggested two pounds per week) is a good chunk of change.
Fortunately, I’m happy with my approach, so I’ll stick with it for now! But good luck. And one of these days, perhaps you can post on your site a long-term success rate for your plan. Are people who follow your plan successful at five years?
March 19th, 2006 at 4:14 pm
Thank you, Beth, for your good wishes. I know you are happy with your approach and I love to read what you have to say. The business in its present form is only just starting. I’ve coached by telephone, off and on, since 1993 and those who followed directions are still at goal weight. But I hope to have a book out before 5 more years go by!
March 19th, 2006 at 4:27 pm
Thanks for the transcript. It’s refreshing to see that someone out there understands that sometimes you eat the donut just because it’s there, period. Love your blog, keep up the great thoughtfull work.
March 20th, 2006 at 8:02 am
Mary, can you guestimate what percentage of your clients “followed directions”?
March 21st, 2006 at 2:20 pm
76% of clients were successful. I define a successful client as one who
1. Was determined to succeed
2. Followed directions for at least 21 consecutive days and
3. Achieved goal
I define unsuccessful clients as those who were determined to succeed and followed directions for 21 consecutive days BUT who were discouraged by
1. The necessity of my changing their Target allowances often while I determined their metabolic level, and
2. The length of their plateau (there is only one), which was dependent on the amount they had to lose
I have since made it easier to determine the metabolic level much earlier, so that they needn’t change Target allowances so often. Changing allowances requires time, so it adds to the length of the diet. Also, if the allowance is changed too frequently or too drastically, you will be thrown onto another plateau.
I have also streamlined the method so that no one has a plateau longer than 2 weeks, no matter how much they have to lose. I can even tell you what day you’ll come off it.
I can’t tell you much more, Beth, without giving away the store but I’m glad you asked. Most of what anyone needs to know is on my site.
March 21st, 2006 at 3:11 pm
It occurs to me that you were asking something other than what I answered, Beth.
All those I retained as clients followed directions. Those who didn’t follow directions, I dismissed. Those who became discouraged stopped the diet of their own accord.