Blog home »

Weil and fat politics

Posted November 21, 2005 at 1:23 pm

I picked up Andrew Weil’s new book, Healthy Aging, over the weekend. I’m a big fan of his, and often go searching his website when I have questions on health.

Interestingly, his book briefly touches on the subject of health and weight in a way that is complementary to the themes being raised by books like Fat Politics (which I discussed last week). Dr. Weil writes (emphasis mine):

Sorting out the medical realities about weight is not so easy. It is quite possible that our criteria for obesity and our thinking about its medical implications have been warped by fashion. We all know morbid obesity when we see it; clearly, it interferes with activities of daily living and makes people unhappy, unhealthy, and unlikely to experience successful aging. But is that true of simply being overweight, as indicated by tables of ideal heights and weights and measurements of BMI, the body mass index?

I don’t think so. In fact, being too lean may also compromise health and successful aging. … I will note that those who are somewhat overweight in middle age may enjoy a healthier and longer old age than those who are not and state my belief that it is better to be fit and fat than lean and not fit.

I’m not pushing for big league fat acceptance here. But nor am I going to miss the point that the authors are making either, like I think some might be.

What I think Dr. Weil points out well is the same thing that Oliver does in Fat Politics. Our weight is not the cause of our health problems. Our weight is a side effect of bad diets and lack of activity, and it is these, not the weight, that is likely the cause of the weight-related illnesses like heart disease and diabetes.

And a key point of Fat Politics is that there is very little scientific evidence to show that losing weight improves health, and in fact, some weight-loss diets may worsen health.

Anyways, as this morning’s post shows, I’m not against weight loss. But I do appreciate the point that Oliver and Weil are making. Don’t kid yourself about why (or how) you’re losing the weight. If you do so with a crappy diet and without the right kind of physical activity, you may be thin, but you won’t be healthy, and you probably won’t be improving your life expectancy.

That said, I don’t think we should throw out the weight loss baby with the “obesity epidemic” bathwater. But given how difficult it is for the average person to lose weight, I think we have to look at why the whole weight loss industry is failing miserably (unless you count the balance sheets for bariatric surgeons).

There’s gotta be a better way.

4 Responses to “Weil and fat politics”

  1. Debra Says:

    Dr. Weil also makes some wonderful comments about accepting the aging process. At 50, maybe I’m not old enough to understand where all the aging unhappiness comes from, but I pray often that I will accept age as a beautiful part of my life and not fight to look younger and younger through artificial means.

  2. Jimmy Moore Says:

    I have not read Dr. Weil’s book, but FAT POLITICS I believe is sending would-be weight losers the wrong message by telling them that there is no “obesity epidemic.” Just sit in any mall in America for an hour and count the number of people who pass you who could stand to lose some weight. It will BLOW your mind and give you a better understanding of just how bad this weighty issue has become in the United States and I would assume worldwide. Let’s keep things in perspective and stop giving people excuses for ignoring their need to lose weight.

  3. Beth Says:

    Hey Jimmy, I don’t disagree that there are a lot of fat people. What Oliver is saying in Fat Politics is that it isn’t their weight that is causing their health problems, and losing the weight may not improve their health. He is making the fairly important point that it’s what you eat and whether you exercise that is the real issue, not the number on the scale.

    I agree that the two (weight and health) are related. But Oliver and Campos (Obesity Myth) are pointing out that there is very little evidence to show that overweight is the *cause* of these health problems, nor is there evidence to show that losing weight improves health. Now there are certainly other reasons to lose weight. And there are also ways to improve health that don’t necessarily make weight loss the primary goal (though it may well be a side-effect of a better diet and exercise plan).

    So I don’t think we need to give people excuses, but we need to give them the right prescription.

  4. gravydiet Says:

    I think we need to understand why the ” weight loss industry is failing” [to help people lose weight]. It failed at that goal specifically because the diet industry was not designed to help people lose weight, it was designed to bilk suckers out of billions of dollars.